![]() |
The special committee meets to devise a future plan of action on Kashmir |
ISLAMABAD: A gathering of the nation's big bosses led by Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi got in progress on Saturday to talk about the circumstance in Indian-involved Kashmir and devise a future game plan in light of the memorable United Nations Security Council (UNSC) debatable held multi-day back.
Different Pakistani foundations are a piece of the gathering, which would spread out a future game-plan over the Kashmir question after a truly fruitful UNSC session on Friday saw the chamber individuals encourage the gatherings required to cease from any one-sided activity that may exasperate the circumstance.
The gathering, which was reported by Qureshi following the UNSC session, would examine the progressing security lockdown in involved Kashmir and the human rights infringement being executed by the Indian troops.
The members would likewise examine finally India's proceeding truce infringement along the Line of Control and the sneaking risk of an atomic encounter between the two neighbors.
Azad Jammu and Kashmir President Sardar Masood Khan, alongside different other government priests and uncommon counselors to the head administrator, are going to the gathering, sources said.
"The Kashmir issue was examined at the Security Council just because today following five decades," Foreign Minister Qureshi told media after Friday's session, adding that he wished to offer his thanks to the individuals from the UNSC, who, he noted, were not influenced by India's endeavors and proceeded with their gathering as planned.
The UNSC met away from public scrutiny in line with China and Pakistan to examine the Indian government's ongoing choice to deny the uncommon status of involved Kashmir.
The gathering took up the issue of the basic circumstance in involved Kashmir after over a long time since it kept going talked about on the stage, viably dismissing India's position that involved Kashmir was an inward issue and not a globally perceived question.
0 Comments